2019考研英語(yǔ)二真題小作文原題及解讀范文

　　Part A

　　47.

　　Directions:

　　Suppose professor Smith asked you to plan a debate on the theme of city traffic. Write him an email to

　　1) Suggest a specific topic with your reasons, and

　　2) Tell him about your arrangements.

　　You should write neatly on the ANWSER SHEET.

　　Do not sign you own name at the end of the letter, use “Li Ming ” instead.

　　Do not write the address. (10 points)

　　解析：

　　今年的英語(yǔ)二小作文又考察了書(shū)信的形式，還是在意料之中的。從歷年來(lái)的考查形式來(lái)看：無(wú)論是英語(yǔ)一還是英語(yǔ)二，小作文考查書(shū)信類(lèi)和告示類(lèi)兩種。其中，從近年的考頻來(lái)說(shuō)，書(shū)信是考查的重點(diǎn)。在英語(yǔ)二中，小作文考查了10年，其中，9年都考查到了書(shū)信。但從內(nèi)容來(lái)說(shuō)今年的英語(yǔ)二的小作文有點(diǎn)難度。再次考察了介紹性的內(nèi)容為主的信。英語(yǔ)二之前的小作文雖然考過(guò)介紹性的信，但都是內(nèi)容相對(duì)單一的話(huà)題，如17年考察的介紹中國(guó)文化的演講內(nèi)容的介紹，這一次不僅有安排介紹，還要給出建議的主題和原因，內(nèi)容比較多樣，不像之前的建議話(huà)題那樣單一。

　　寫(xiě)作時(shí)，按照一般順序。第一段寫(xiě)過(guò)渡性?xún)?nèi)容和寫(xiě)信目的;第二段具體給出擬定的討論話(huà)題并給出理由和討論的安排;第三段表達(dá)客套性?xún)?nèi)容和期待。本文的三段內(nèi)容可以這樣安排：。一段中因?yàn)楸疚牡氖招湃耸墙淌?，屬于稍正式的信件，但畢竟是認(rèn)識(shí)的人，所以在第一段就不寫(xiě)自我介紹了，表達(dá)很開(kāi)心接到這個(gè)任務(wù)并會(huì)認(rèn)真完成，之后說(shuō)明寫(xiě)信目的。第二段具體給出一個(gè)討論的主題并給出原因和安排。第三段表示希望對(duì)方給予建議并期待討論會(huì)圓滿(mǎn)舉辦。

　　另外，注意小作文的評(píng)分側(cè)重點(diǎn)?？佳写缶V指出：A 節(jié)作文的評(píng)分側(cè)重點(diǎn)在于信息點(diǎn)的覆蓋、內(nèi)容的組織、語(yǔ)言的準(zhǔn)確性、格式和語(yǔ)域的恰當(dāng)。對(duì)語(yǔ)法結(jié)構(gòu)和詞匯多樣性的要求將根據(jù)具體試題作調(diào)整。允許在作文中使用提示語(yǔ)中出現(xiàn)過(guò)的個(gè)別關(guān)鍵詞或詞組，但使用提示語(yǔ)中出現(xiàn)過(guò)的句子將被扣分。這一點(diǎn)一定要引起重視!

　　范文：

　　Dear Prof.Smith,

　　I feel really delighted and honored to have the opportunity to suggest and plan a debate on the theme of city traffic, and I’m writing to contribute my personal view on this debate.

　　I would be ready to discuss this matter in further details. As for the topic, I hold the opinion that we may focus on “Low-carbon Commuting”. Owing to the fact that the quality of air in our city is far from satisfying and most of us frequently experience traffic jam due to too many private car on the road, it is environment-friendly to choose those clean-energy vehicles and public transportation. The debate will explore some specific effective measures to achieve low carbon transport. Participants can be divided into two groups to present their view alternatively and the one contribute more appealing means will be the winner and awarded prizes.

　　Those two aspects are what I would like to emphasize, and I would like to know of your opinions on this and I wish you could give me some further ideas on it. I am looking forward to your reply.

　　Yours faithfully,

　　Li Ming